Once again, the members of NAG and serval community members
attended the morning council meeting. “The Friends of the Nanticoke” and “The
Nanticoke Watershed Alliance” sent representatives as well. At least 6 people
spoke against the chicken sludge and storage tank and at times their accounts
were very graphic verbalizations of how badly the sludge had affected their
ability to be outside on their own property. One person talked about having to
destroy produce from his stand because the flies overwhelmed it and that
children could not play outside because the grass was “working” with flies.
Our cause warranted a planned “open work session” after the
initial meeting was over. Members of the council, the Department of Planning
and Zoning and Community Development were among those who sat together to
review the sludge and the storage tank issues.
At the end of the session, Council President, John Cannon, asked
some people to get more information. The council entertained the following
ideas which were brought up multiple times.
Agricultural Reconciliation
As per the “Right to Farm”
provision, “An Agricultural Reconciliation Board is a five or seven member
committee of appropriate members of the community who mediate and sometimes
arbitrate disputes between parties resulting from perceived or real nuisance
complaints.” Participants are bound by the county’s decision, but can appeal to
the circuit court.
Change of Status
The group wanted to know if the storage
tank is business related and not under the protection of an ag-related storage
facility. (This apparently is what Dorchester County did by virtue of the
proposed tank’s size.) The group discussed the differences between business and
agriculture uses and wanted to learn more about how the tank would be used and
where the sludge can and cannot go. In addition, one council member asked if
the sludge is not a 100% ag product, how can it be considered agriculture. Likewise,
the use of the roads surrounding the tank may undergo a status change.
Good Neighbor Appeal
One council member suggested that
a representative of the county appeal to Mr. Burns personally to not put the
tank on Porter Mill Road or near other residences. The council member asked if anyone
had gone to Burns and told him that people are very upset about this.
In addition, most of the council members were adamant that
there should be assurances that the spreading and storage of the sludge strictly
follows all regulations and that all activity can be tracked. More information
from the Maryland Department of Agriculture would be needed to ensure that the
individuals are “following the letter of the law.”
Along with looking for solutions to the immediate problem, the
council president asked the Department of Zoning & Planning to investigate
how other counties have updated their agricultural zoning by instituting
multiple ag districts. (Right now, Wicomico County has only one ag district, Ag
1.) Here is the zoning map from the Wicomico County, Maryland webpage.
No comments:
Post a Comment